In the aftermath of last Tuesday's lame duck approval of the Griffith Street Hotel by the outgoing Davidson Board of Commissioners, there has been a considerable amount of swirl around town. Much of that regards confusion on the status of the Community School of Davidson at the location adjacent to the now approved hotel site. This swirl can be linked to what can best be described as "misinformation" from the dais at Davidson Town Hall last week and before.
Here is just a sample of statements regarding this subject from recent meetings.
The Davidson Board met on October 24th for the last discussion on the Griffith Street Hotel before voting on it last Tuesday. At the very end of the Hotel discussion at that meeting, comments turned to what could be done with the land where CSD's K-7 building currently sits. Outgoing Commissioner Beth Cashion asked...
"What's the current zoning on the Elox...er, the CSD building?"
More than a decade ago the CSD building was the home of the former Elox Corporation. Commissioner Cashion asking that question that way was a bit of a Freudian slip showing a disconnect from the facts that space is a school now, it has been for a decade, and has a lease on file for many years more.
That was followed soon after by outgoing Mayor John Woods asking this question to Planning Director, Jason Burdett.
"So, Jason..If that building were to be razed, um...and the school were to relocate, or not, what would be by right zoning there?"
That "hypothetical" about tearing down, or razing, the CSD K-7 building, sure sounds like planning for a post CSD scenario, doesn't it?
Then at the meeting last week before the vote, outgoing Commissioner Cashion again brought up CSD's status on the site as part of her statement before she voted for the hotel.
"The conversations around CSD - certainly supportive of CSD - reached out a couple of times to CSD to meet with them. I have spoken with the owner of the building and it’s a difficult position to be in making a decision about a long term opportunity when you have CSD as a school in an industrial site. I also understand they (CSD) are not the owners of that building, they are leasing that building and it’s an understanding, and a pretty clear understanding that CSD will not be there in that building in 10 years to come. CSD bought 40 acres out on Beaties Ford road and are starting to build their sports complex there so, I think we are tasked with a difficult decision."
Cashion's comments highlighted in bold are misleading on a couple of points. aShortChronicle spoke to CSD Executive Director, Joy Warner, on Friday to see if these statements could be clarified. Here is what Warner confirmed.
Yes, CSD leases the building. However, the lease on file with the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds shows the current lease runs until January 1, 2027 and has a five year option to extend. Meaning, CSD can remain on the site for 14 more years as renters. Furthermore, CSD has in the lease an "irrevocable option" to buy the site between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. That means the school could be permanently located where it is today.
Additionally, Warner commented to aShortChronicle on the Huntersville property for a sports complex that CSD is in the process of raising money to purchase. According to Warner, every time that property has been discussed with parents it has been made clear that the Huntersville site is not intended for relocation of either of the school's Davidson campuses.
In the face of this information from the school, how the Town got a "clear understanding" that the CSD K-7 school would not be in its current location in ten years is...well...very unclear. However, that incorrect understanding and the incorrect idea that the Huntersville site means something more than just being a location for a sports complex, seems to have been one of the driving forces behind the Town's decision to approve the hotel.
For something this important, for something that impacts children, for something that impacts a school that brings many tangible benefits to the town, the Town government could have and certainly should have done a much more thorough job in its due dilligence prior to making its decision on the hotel.
Unfortunately for the town, that did not happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment